timezone -> time zone

[tc@…]

Following an email by Jon Skeet 2014-07-02
​https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2014-July/021119.html

I proposed 2014-07-03 to Mr. Daboo to change
"timezone" to "time zone"
​https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2014-July/021129.html

2014-07-06 IETF Area Director Barry Leiba then wrote that he changed
the -04 version of the charter except for the WG name, and asked the
Secretariat to change the latter:
​https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2014-July/021143.html

​https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-tzdist/00-04/
only shows "time zone" in the text area.

The current version, "01", of 2014-08-08, for which the HTTP interface
seems to offer no readable permanent link on the site, but I try
​https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-tzdist/01/
is the first that contains the WG name in the proposed format
"Time Zone Data Distribution Service"

The text contains

---

The working group will use the following drafts as initial input for its
work:
draft-douglass-timezone-service-11
draft-daboo-caldav-timezone-ref-01

---

The URLs I found are
​http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-douglass-timezone-service-11
​http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-daboo-caldav-timezone-ref-01

Both these drafts use "timezone" in the name and in their text bodies.

I propose to change their names to

• draft-douglass-time-zone-service-11
• draft-daboo-caldav-time-zone-ref-01

and to replace in the text bodies "timezone" with "time zone"

Reasoning:
Increase clarity by using one name for one concept.

RFC 6557 uses "time zone"
​http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6557

Some reasoning by Tobias Conradi emailed 2014-07-03
​https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2014-July/021137.html

[lear@…]

From Cyrus:

I have agreed to make the change to "time zone" (in fact I added it to the draft to-do
list I maintain with my working copy after we agreed on that several months ago).

If this WG decides to adopt the current draft as a WG item, and decides that Mike and I
should remain as authors/editors, then I will make the change for the first WG draft -
not before (because it would be wasteful of IETF resources at this moment).

[lear@…]

This change was made in -01, as requested.