Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of Ticket #20, comment 9


Ignore:
Timestamp:
08/02/20 21:47:32 (20 months ago)
Author:
moeller0@…
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #20, comment 9

    v3 v4  
    3737It seems the identifier question was first posed at ietf95 and also did not get a consensus poll then and there.
    3838And by ietf97 the question appears to have been settled (and three L4S drafts were adopted en block by hum).
     39
     40
    3941Edit: Stopped one ietf meeting too early, this seems to have been adopted at ietf98, without a explicit discussion of the pros and cons of the proposed ECT(1) overloaded both as an indicator that a flow promises to respond to CE markings in a 1/p mode as well as a intention marker of a flow to request the L4S queue. I note that that seemed to have happened in Chicago.
    4042