Timeline
01/12/15:
- 08:00 Ticket #139 (move text re: domain labels to CA specification) created by
- Section 4 describes the problems posed by private domain labels and …
- 06:28 Ticket #138 (use of term before defining it) created by
- In section 3, “precertificate” is used before being defined. Also, …
30/11/15:
- 21:14 Ticket #125 (change "will return" to "MUST return") closed by
- wontfix
- 16:17 Ticket #137 (Section 13, an unlucky number?) closed by
- fixed
- 16:17 Ticket #117 (log description as "untrusted") closed by
- fixed
- 16:16 Ticket #128 (section 5 over-claims the properties of an STH) closed by
- fixed
- 16:16 Ticket #135 (Subjects (vs. Monitors) observing logs?) closed by
- fixed
- 12:39 Ticket #125 (change "will return" to "MUST return") reopened by
- Reopening, because comment:1 is wrong. The "will return" text is …
27/11/15:
- 19:20 Ticket #83 (CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA) closed by
- fixed
- 18:34 Ticket #125 (change "will return" to "MUST return") closed by
- fixed
- 18:34 Ticket #136 (inconsistent discussion of mis-issued certs and compliance) closed by
- invalid
- 18:33 Ticket #93 (Monitor description: Inconsistency between intro and section 5.4) closed by
- fixed
- 18:33 Ticket #64 (remove specification of signature and hash lags from section 2) closed by
- fixed
26/11/15:
20/11/15:
- 16:28 Ticket #137 (Section 13, an unlucky number?) created by
- The text in section 13 seems like an afterthought; it might better be …
- 16:27 Ticket #136 (inconsistent discussion of mis-issued certs and compliance) created by
- Section 12.1 contradicts text in Section 9.2. 12.1 says that a …
- 16:25 Ticket #135 (Subjects (vs. Monitors) observing logs?) created by
- Section 12 says “ … the client knows that the subject of the …
- 16:22 Ticket #134 (client use of logs to detect mis-issued certs) created by
- Section 12 says that TLS clients can use logs and SCTs to reduce the …
19/11/15:
- 22:40 Ticket #133 (incomplete Misbehaving Logs section) created by
- [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-10#section-12 …
- 22:26 Ticket #132 (unclear motivation for and handling of re-logging entries from a frozen log) created by
- From …
- 22:11 Ticket #131 (missing guidance for TLS servers to select logs) created by
- [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-10#section-7 …
- 16:24 Ticket #130 (Support Delegation of SCT Feedback/STH Pollination) created by
- Delegation is always possible, it's just currently difficult. Maybe …
- 02:25 Ticket #129 (how do submitters determine what a log will accept?) created by
- [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-10#section-5. …
- 02:19 Ticket #128 (section 5 over-claims the properties of an STH) created by
- From …
17/11/15:
- 21:50 Ticket #127 (confusing case is allowed: submission of pre-cert without embedding ...) created by
- [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-10#section-3. …
- 21:42 Ticket #126 (text leaves open the possibility that a submitter might not verify the ...) created by
- From …
- 21:35 Ticket #125 (change "will return" to "MUST return") created by
- In …
- 21:16 Ticket #124 (introduction needs work) created by
- The architecture document presents a much clearer characterization of …
- 20:46 Ticket #123 (log clients description too informal, incomplete) created by
- Section 9 discusses log clients, but uses a lot of language that is …
- 20:42 Ticket #122 (TLS server requirements) created by
- Section 7 describes some (but probably not all) requirements for TLS …
- 20:40 Ticket #121 (log metadata dissemination) created by
- After Prague I agreed that log metadata can be supplied by browser …
16/11/15:
- 04:49 Ticket #76 (Normative client behavior specified in Section 3.4) closed by
- fixed: This seems quite clear - I'm closing it as fixed.
13/11/15:
- 18:47 Ticket #120 (public vs. private logs?) created by
- Section 3.1 says “Anyone can submit a certificate (Section 6.1) to a …
- 18:45 Ticket #119 (confusing wording about log checking in Introduction) created by
- The introduction says “The checking operation is asynchronous to allow …
- 18:44 Ticket #118 (Monitor function description problem) created by
- The introduction states “Those who are concerned about misissue [sic] …
- 18:42 Ticket #117 (log description as "untrusted") created by
- The introduction stills refers to logs as “untrusted” yet this is a …
- 18:40 Ticket #116 (ned definition for mis-issuance) created by
- the document does not include a definition for misissuance [sic], even …
- 11:06 Ticket #115 (Verify that recommended consistency checking algorithm is correct) created by
- The algorithm in …
04/11/15:
- 12:41 Ticket #114 (Name the OCSP Stapling TLS extension correctly) created by
- Currently we say "where the OCSP response is provided in the …
- 12:20 Ticket #113 (Add advice about the tls-feature TLS extension) created by
- RFC7633 standardizes the TLS Feature certificate extension. This …
03/11/15:
- 15:22 Ticket #112 (Consider permitting the status_request_v2 TLS extension) created by
- Currently we require TLS clients to implement the original …
- 14:46 Ticket #111 (Consider using the cached-info TLS extension) created by
- It looks like the cached-info RFC will be published very soon: …
- 01:13 Ticket #99 (Clearer definition of when a certificate is CT-compliant needed) closed by
- fixed
- 01:11 Ticket #99 (Clearer definition of when a certificate is CT-compliant needed) reopened by
- 01:05 Ticket #99 (Clearer definition of when a certificate is CT-compliant needed) closed by
- needs-review: Propose this ticket be closed (Fixed) as the term 'compliant' is now …
Note: See TracTimeline
for information about the timeline view.