Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #8, comment 7


Ignore:
Timestamp:
28/07/14 16:54:10 (7 years ago)
Author:
tom@…
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #8, comment 7

    initial v1  
    77
    88Clients would not be able to detect:
    9  * if the log server claimed a window contained more inclusions proofs than the log server could demonstrate via get-proofs-by-timestamp-range (why would log servers both? See the attack below)
     9 * if the log server claimed a window contained more inclusions proofs than the log server could demonstrate via get-proofs-by-timestamp-range, but then didn't check by calling get-proofs-by-timestamp-range (why would log servers lie in this case? See the attack below)
    1010
    1111All responses to get-proofs-by-timestamp-range would have to be gossiped to monitors, for this misbehaviour to be accountable.