Opened 7 years ago

Last modified 6 years ago

#71 new defect

Section 1 does not define mis-issuance

Reported by: kent@… Owned by: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis@…
Priority: critical Milestone:
Component: threat-analysis Version:
Severity: - Keywords:
Cc:

Description

Since mis-issuance is cited as the rationale for CT, it really must be defined here.
text has been proposed to define mis-issuance, but has not been incorporated

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by rob.stradling@…

  • Component changed from client-behavior to rfc6962-bis

client-behavior is clearly the wrong component for this ticket.

It's true that 6962-bis does not define mis-issuance, but isn't the threat-analysis document the place for such a definition to appear?

I'm changing the component to 6962-bis, but I'm inclined to resolve this ticket as a WONTFIX. Thoughts?

comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by benl@…

  • Component changed from rfc6962-bis to threat-analysis
  • Owner changed from draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@… to draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis@…

comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by melinda.shore@…

My mistake - this is for the threat analysis, not the -bis draft.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.