Opened 8 years ago

Closed 7 years ago

#53 closed enhancement (fixed)

Clarify log entry ordering requirements

Reported by: rob.stradling@… Owned by: rob.stradling@…
Priority: minor Milestone: review
Component: rfc6962-bis Version:
Severity: - Keywords:


All but one of the RFC6962 logs that have so far requested inclusion in Chromium seem to list the entries in chronological order.

Strict chronological order is nice, but it's not a requirement. As long as each new entry gets included within the log's MMD, all is well.

I think it could be worth stating explicitly that strict chronological ordering is not required (for logs) and must not be expected (by clients).

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by rob.stradling@…

  • Owner changed from draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@… to rob.stradling@…
  • Status changed from new to assigned

comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by melinda.shore@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from assigned to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.