#187 closed defect (wontfix)
Use IANA-managed OIDs
Reported by: | rlb@… | Owned by: | draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | |
Component: | to-be-decided | Version: | |
Severity: | - | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
I disagree with the conclusion reached in #81, and agree with Russ that we should use an IETF-managed arc. Three octets is not worth the risk of using private identifiers in an IETF specification.
1.3.101.78 => 06 03 2B 65 4E
1.3.6.1.5.8.1 => 06 06 2B 06 01 05 08 01
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by rlb@…
- Summary changed from User IANA-managed OIDs to Use IANA-managed OIDs
comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by rob.stradling@…
- Component changed from client-behavior to to-be-decided
comment:3 follow-ups: ↓ 4 ↓ 6 Changed 5 years ago by rob.stradling@…
comment:4 in reply to: ↑ 3 Changed 5 years ago by rob.stradling@…
Replying to rob.stradling@…:
I propose that we close this ticket as "wontfix".
In other words, let's continue to use the OIDs from the 1.3.101 arc.
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by melinda.shore@…
- Resolution set to wontfix
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 3 Changed 5 years ago by rob.stradling@…
Replying to rob.stradling@…:
OIDs from the 1.3.101 arc are also being used by the CURDLE WG in draft-ietf-curdle-pkix.
Rich Salz mentioned that "Work is in progress to turn the arc over to IETF / IANA / someone-like-us." [1]
See this I-D:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry
Should TRANS produce a similar document for the OIDs under the 1.3.101 arc that we're using?
OIDs from the 1.3.101 arc are also being used by the CURDLE WG in draft-ietf-curdle-pkix.
Rich Salz mentioned that "Work is in progress to turn the arc over to IETF / IANA / someone-like-us." [1]
I propose that we close this ticket as "wontfix".
[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/656DnTC7JKjuyY8Z_U-FaBowWh8