Opened 5 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

#172 closed defect (fixed)

Pick one structure for multiple TransItems

Reported by: rlb@… Owned by: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@…
Priority: major Milestone: review
Component: rfc6962-bis Version:
Severity: - Keywords:


The specification should define only one of TransItemList and
SCTWithProofDataV2. I can see the appeal of having a more structured format,
but TransItemList? seems more flexible, and thus a better option in the long run.

Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by rob.stradling@…

  • Component changed from client-behavior to to-be-decided

comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by eranm@…

  • Component changed from to-be-decided to rfc6962-bis
  • Milestone set to review

I support removing the SCTWithProofDataV2 structure from 6962-bis.

This structure was used to hold a combination of SCT + STH + inclusion proof to that STH.
The same functionality can be achieved with a TransItemList? that contains each of those, so it makes sense to remove it (as it would simplify parsing of TransItems? without affecting functionality).

The change was reviewed and merged in

Leaving for the chairs to approve, if there's no objection on the list.

comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by rob.stradling@…

Further editorial changes were reviewed and merged in

comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by melinda.shore@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.