Opened 6 years ago

Last modified 6 years ago

#149 new enhancement

Architecture document: Figure 1: Finer-grained distinction between entities

Reported by: eranm@… Owned by: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis@…
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: threat-analysis Version:
Severity: - Keywords:
Cc:

Description

In Figure 1, there's a very good distinction between "defined by CT" / "out of scope for CT" interface.

However I suggest the distinction should be finer-grained to indicate which interfaces are specified in RFC6962-bis, which ones in the gossip protocol and which ones entirely out of CT.

Change History (1)

comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by kent@…

We will make a finer-grained distinction in this diagram, i.e., defined by CT requirements specs, vs. the Gossip experimental spec, vs. completely out of scope.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.