Opened 6 years ago

Closed 6 years ago

#140 closed defect (fixed)

move section 8 to CA specification

Reported by: kseo@… Owned by: rob.stradling@…
Priority: critical Milestone: review
Component: rfc6962-bis Version:
Severity: - Keywords:


Section 8 is devoted to CA's but doesn't specify the requirements using RFC 2119 terms. Also, there are other CA requirements that need to be covered, e.g., metadata such as max chain length, how this data is acquired by the CA. There needs to be more discussion of CA requirements and clarification of what apects are not covered by the CT architecture. Ideally, this would be in a separate document to avoid making 6962-bis more complicated.

Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by rob.stradling@…

  • Owner changed from draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@… to rob.stradling@…
  • Status changed from new to assigned

comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by rob.stradling@…

  • Milestone set to review

Moving to review. As agreed with the chairs, we've only addressed the 2119 issues. Punting on the rest.

comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by melinda.shore@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from assigned to closed

Agreed that the additional material should be in a different document.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.