Opened 8 years ago

#18 new defect

Section 6.2: FEC

Reported by: bernard_aboba@… Owned by: draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage@…
Priority: major Milestone: milestone1
Component: rtp-usage Version: 1.0
Severity: Active WG Document Keywords:
Cc:

Description

At the time

of this writing there is no consensus on which, if any, of these FEC
schemes is appropriate for use in the WebRTC context. Accordingly,
this memo makes no recommendation on the choice of block-based FEC
for WebRTC use.

[BA] By being vague on both NACK as well as FEC requirements, I think we've set ourselves up for issues with respect to implementation quality if not interoperability. In practice, it may be possible to come up with some advice to FEC implementers (perhaps not at a REQUIRED but a RECOMMENDED level). So I think we might want to revisit this.

Change History (0)

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.