Opened 13 years ago

Closed 13 years ago

Last modified 12 years ago

#84 closed defect (fixed)

Statement on Mobile IP is unnecessary

Reported by: kempf@… Owned by: kempf@…
Priority: minor Milestone:
Component: nohost-req Severity:
Keywords: REQ draft Cc: netlmm@…


Fred Templin says:

3) Section 2.8, second paragraph, sentence beginning: "While Mobile IPv6 is clearly...", this seems to be making too strong of an assumption for MIPv6 before the global mobility management problem statement and gap analysis are completed. Suggest dropping this sentence.

Change History (2)

comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by kempf@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

Removed the assumption about Mobile IP but kept the rest of the sentence. The part about proprietary protocols is important, and I added another qualifier for "wireless link technology specific" protocols, since some of the SDOs that are interested in this protocol have need for backward compatibility.

comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by anonymous

  • Milestone milestone2 deleted

Milestone milestone2 deleted

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.