Opened 12 years ago

#171 new technical

Use of MN-ID

Reported by: christian.vogt@… Owned by: Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@…
Priority: normal Milestone: PMIPv6 base specification
Component: draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6 Severity:
Keywords: Cc:

Description

The current P-MIPv6 spec calls for the inclusion of the MN-ID in every P-MIPv6 message. Is this necessary?

This issue was raised by Alper Yegin in his email "MN-Id overspecification" on Sep 26.

Change History (0)

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.