![(please configure the [header_logo] section in trac.ini)](https://www.ietf.org/images/ietflogotrans.gif)
Timeline
Apr 14, 2011:
- 9:40 PM Ticket #110 ("Mapping Protocol Data" in Map-Reply Message Format (comment 22 ...) closed by
- 9:34 PM Ticket #111 (Semantics of LSB) closed by
- 9:18 PM Ticket #63 (On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review)) closed by
Apr 8, 2011:
- 3:04 AM Ticket #71 (Missing description mechanism to make EID-to-RLOC (from D. ...) closed by
- 3:03 AM Ticket #109 ("Locator" in Map-reply message format (comment 22 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 3:02 AM Ticket #106 (Unassigned values in Map-Reply messages (comment 22 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 3:02 AM Ticket #104 (Impact of slashdotting ETR (comment 21 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 3:01 AM Ticket #103 (Mapping Protocol Data (comment 20 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 3:00 AM Ticket #99 (Confusion in Section 5.4.1 (comment 18 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 3:00 AM Ticket #98 (LISP nonce (comment 17 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:59 AM Ticket #97 (MTU concerns (comment 16 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:58 AM Ticket #96 (Confidence in informal Survey (comment 16 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:57 AM Ticket #94 (Implications on using Control plane for data forwarding (comment 15 ...) closed by
- 2:56 AM Ticket #89 (On redefining the name of the encapsulated packet header (comment 12 ...) closed by
- 2:56 AM Ticket #86 (On the design goals and requirements (comment 10 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:54 AM Ticket #84 (Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported ...) closed by
- 2:53 AM Ticket #80 (Router Performances) closed by
- 2:53 AM Ticket #69 (Inadequate solution for ETR overclaims (from Y. Rekhter's review)) closed by
- 2:52 AM Ticket #68 (What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero ...) closed by
- 2:51 AM Ticket #57 (How to determine EIDs not forwardable on the routable topology (from ...) closed by
- 2:49 AM Ticket #51 (Returning same locator-set for a given EID (review by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:48 AM Ticket #50 (MAP-Replies content that MUST be invariant (review by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:47 AM Ticket #49 ("MAP-Replies" content that is allowed to change (review by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:42 AM Ticket #45 (LISP vs. Existing (from Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:38 AM Ticket #13 (Use of Zero UDP Checksums (in IPv4 and IPv6) Requires Analysis) closed by
- 2:37 AM Ticket #4 (LISP errors) closed by
Apr 1, 2011:
Mar 30, 2011:
- 8:15 AM Ticket #115 (claims in Section 7) closed by
- 8:09 AM Ticket #112 (use of re-encapsulation is underspecified) closed by
- 7:19 AM Ticket #115 (claims in Section 7) reopened by
- -11 version still has the following: LISP is designed to be very …
- 7:11 AM Ticket #112 (use of re-encapsulation is underspecified) reopened by
- From the last proposed resolution text: Re-encapsulation is a …
- 2:40 AM Ticket #115 (claims in Section 7) closed by
- 2:36 AM Ticket #48 (MAP-Replies returning different contents for a given EID (review by Y, ...) closed by
- 2:34 AM Ticket #47 (Ambiguity on "MAP-replies" requirements (review by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:24 AM Ticket #113 (inbound traffic engineering support with LISP) closed by
- 2:21 AM Ticket #112 (use of re-encapsulation is underspecified) closed by
- 1:22 AM Ticket #93 (VPN (comment 14 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 1:12 AM Ticket #91 (Data probe (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 1:05 AM Ticket #90 (Restricting re-encapsulation (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 1:03 AM Ticket #88 ("Proxy device" description (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 12:53 AM Ticket #85 (Mobility without address changing (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 12:35 AM Ticket #83 (Wording in Abstract (comment 8 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 12:33 AM Ticket #82 (Wording in Abstract (comment 8 and 44 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 12:23 AM Ticket #114 (EID-to-RLOC mapping - transients) closed by
Mar 29, 2011:
- 11:59 PM Ticket #78 (Missing things (from J. Arkko's mail)) closed by
- 11:57 PM Ticket #77 (On the use of key-chaining for re-keying) closed by
- 11:54 PM Ticket #23 (inner source RLOC undefined in some cases) closed by
- 11:53 PM Ticket #76 (Implication of using anycast addresses for Map-servers) closed by
- 11:44 PM Ticket #21 (Section 5.1 behavior) closed by
- 11:39 PM Ticket #22 (An ETR MUST consume UDP port 4342 packets not addressed to it) closed by
Mar 22, 2011:
- 6:31 AM Ticket #115 (claims in Section 7) created by
- From Section 7: LISP is designed to be very hardware-based …
- 6:06 AM Ticket #44 (LISP vs existing (reported by Yakov Rekhter)) closed by
Mar 16, 2011:
- 1:11 PM Ticket #101 (Filtering ICMP messages (comment 19 reported by Y. Rekhter)) reopened by
- The issues raised in this ticket are still not addressed. Until these …
- 1:04 PM Ticket #111 (Semantics of LSB) reopened by
- In order to close the ticket the authors have to answer the question …
- 1:02 PM Ticket #27 (ETR may claim a larger prefix than is delegated to it) reopened by
- Before closing the ticket please document how the issue raised by the …
- 12:52 PM Ticket #42 (On the SMR mechanism) reopened by
- The new text is still inadequate: Since the ETRs don't keep track …
- 12:36 PM Ticket #44 (LISP vs existing (reported by Yakov Rekhter)) reopened by
- In order to close the ticket the authors need to point to the text …
- 12:35 PM Ticket #45 (LISP vs. Existing (from Y. Rekhter)) reopened by
- In order to close the ticket the authors should point to the text that …
- 12:34 PM Ticket #46 (Cache Thrashing (review by Y. Rekhter)) reopened by
- The issue raised in this ticket has to be addresses. Until it is …
- 12:33 PM Ticket #47 (Ambiguity on "MAP-replies" requirements (review by Y. Rekhter)) reopened by
- Until the authors point to the text that addresses the issue raised in …
- 12:31 PM Ticket #49 ("MAP-Replies" content that is allowed to change (review by Y. Rekhter)) reopened by
- Before closing the issue please point to the text that has been …
- 12:30 PM Ticket #50 (MAP-Replies content that MUST be invariant (review by Y. Rekhter)) reopened by
- In order to close the issue please point to the text that has been …
- 12:27 PM Ticket #53 (Reachability between ETR and EID (review by Y. Rekhter)) reopened by
- In order to close the ticket the authors need to answer the question …
- 12:26 PM Ticket #57 (How to determine EIDs not forwardable on the routable topology (from ...) reopened by
- In order to close this ticket the authors should answer the question …
- 12:24 PM Ticket #63 (On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review)) reopened by
- The new draft still does not fully address the issue raised in this …
- 12:14 PM Ticket #66 (Strict RLOC ordering causing problems on mapping changes) reopened by
- The issues raised in this ticket are still not addressed. Therefore …
- 12:12 PM Ticket #68 (What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero ...) reopened by
- The question raised in this ticket is still not answered. Thus the …
- 12:09 PM Ticket #70 (Client not respecting RLOC weights (from Y. Rekhter's review)) reopened by
- The issue raised in this ticket is still not addressed. Thus the …
- 12:08 PM Ticket #73 (Tunnel liveness (from R. Bonica review for the RTG directorate)) reopened by
- The issue raised in this ticket is still not addressed. Thus the …
- 12:07 PM Ticket #71 (Missing description mechanism to make EID-to-RLOC (from D. ...) reopened by
- I don't think that the issue raised in this ticket has been addressed. …
- 12:03 PM Ticket #81 (Implication of deploying of xTRs as first/last hop.) reopened by
- I disagree with the authors that "there is no need to make any change …
- 12:02 PM Ticket #84 (Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported ...) reopened by
- I disagree with the authors that "there is no need to make any changes …
- 12:00 PM Ticket #89 (On redefining the name of the encapsulated packet header (comment 12 ...) reopened by
- the question posed in this ticket is still not answered. Until the …
- 11:58 AM Ticket #90 (Restricting re-encapsulation (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter)) reopened by
- The question posed in this comment is still not answered.Thus the …
- 11:56 AM Ticket #94 (Implications on using Control plane for data forwarding (comment 15 ...) reopened by
- The issue raised in this ticket has to be addresses. Until this issue …
- 11:54 AM Ticket #98 (LISP nonce (comment 17 reported by Y. Rekhter)) reopened by
- I disagree with the authors' opinion. Thus the ticket is still open
- 7:47 AM Ticket #114 (EID-to-RLOC mapping - transients) created by
- From section 3: EID-to-RLOC Database: The EID-to-RLOC database …
- 7:41 AM Ticket #48 (MAP-Replies returning different contents for a given EID (review by Y, ...) reopened by
- Please point to the specific text that addresses this comment, and …
- 7:30 AM Ticket #113 (inbound traffic engineering support with LISP) reopened by
- The issue is still unresolved. Moreover, as I mentioned in my e-mail …
- 3:25 AM Ticket #81 (Implication of deploying of xTRs as first/last hop.) closed by
- 3:23 AM Ticket #71 (Missing description mechanism to make EID-to-RLOC (from D. ...) closed by
- 3:22 AM Ticket #41 (Map-Reply sent for not reachable EID (from D. Papadimitriou's review)) closed by
- 3:21 AM Ticket #38 (On the limitation of LISP recursive encapsulation (from D. ...) closed by
- 3:19 AM Ticket #113 (inbound traffic engineering support with LISP) closed by
- 3:17 AM Ticket #111 (Semantics of LSB) closed by
- Authors replied on the mailinglist that in their opinion there is no …
- 3:16 AM Ticket #105 (EID-to-RLOC UDP Map-Reply message (comment 23 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 3:15 AM Ticket #102 (Originating ITR RLOC address (comment 20 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 3:13 AM Ticket #101 (Filtering ICMP messages (comment 19 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 3:11 AM Ticket #100 ("Stateless" and "Stateful" MTU handling (comment 18 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 3:10 AM Ticket #94 (Implications on using Control plane for data forwarding (comment 15 ...) closed by
- 3:08 AM Ticket #90 (Restricting re-encapsulation (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 3:07 AM Ticket #89 (On redefining the name of the encapsulated packet header (comment 12 ...) closed by
- 3:05 AM Ticket #84 (Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported ...) closed by
- 3:04 AM Ticket #73 (Tunnel liveness (from R. Bonica review for the RTG directorate)) closed by
- 3:02 AM Ticket #70 (Client not respecting RLOC weights (from Y. Rekhter's review)) closed by
- 3:00 AM Ticket #68 (What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero ...) closed by
- 2:59 AM Ticket #66 (Strict RLOC ordering causing problems on mapping changes) closed by
- 2:48 AM Ticket #63 (On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review)) closed by
- 2:45 AM Ticket #57 (How to determine EIDs not forwardable on the routable topology (from ...) closed by
- 2:43 AM Ticket #53 (Reachability between ETR and EID (review by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:42 AM Ticket #46 (Cache Thrashing (review by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:41 AM Ticket #45 (LISP vs. Existing (from Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:40 AM Ticket #44 (LISP vs existing (reported by Yakov Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:38 AM Ticket #39 (On the performance of cache lookup (from D. Papadimitriou's review)) closed by
- 2:37 AM Ticket #98 (LISP nonce (comment 17 reported by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:32 AM Ticket #34 (Editorial Issues Section 8 of draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt) closed by
- 2:30 AM Ticket #43 (Issues related to RLOC rechability (definition and mechanism)) closed by
- 2:28 AM Ticket #42 (On the SMR mechanism) closed by
- 2:25 AM Ticket #50 (MAP-Replies content that MUST be invariant (review by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:24 AM Ticket #49 ("MAP-Replies" content that is allowed to change (review by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:23 AM Ticket #48 (MAP-Replies returning different contents for a given EID (review by Y, ...) closed by
- Text has been modified to fix the issue.
- 2:20 AM Ticket #47 (Ambiguity on "MAP-replies" requirements (review by Y. Rekhter)) closed by
- 2:18 AM Ticket #40 (On the handling of decapsulated packets (from D. Papadimitriou's review)) closed by
- 2:15 AM Ticket #28 (An ITR may claim a larger prefix than is delegated to it) closed by
- 2:11 AM Ticket #27 (ETR may claim a larger prefix than is delegated to it) closed by
Note: See TracTimeline
for information about the timeline view.
