Opened 9 years ago

Closed 8 years ago

#33 closed editorial (fixed)

Editorial Issues Section 7 of draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt

Reported by: luigi@… Owned by:
Priority: trivial Component: draft-ietf-lisp
Severity: - Keywords:
Cc:

Description (last modified by luigi@…)

This ticket groups together editorial issues raised by D. Papadimitriou and Y. Rekhter in their respective reviews.

From D. Papadimitriou's review:

Section 7: the first paragraph is a wish not a fact. As such it is
doubtful what such paragraph actually brings in the context of a
protocol architecture/specification.

Change History (5)

comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by luigi@…

  • Description modified (diff)
  • Summary changed from Editorial Issues Section 7 of draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt raised by Dimitri Papadimitriou in his review to Editorial Issues Section 7 of draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt

comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by luigi@…

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by luigi@…

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by luigi@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to resolved

The issue has been fixed in version -12 of the draft as described in section B.1:

  • Tracker item 33. Make more clear in the Routing Locator Selection section what an ITR should do when it sees an R-bit of 0 in a locator-record of a Map-Reply.
  • Tracker item 33. Add paragraph to the EID Reachability section indicating that site parittioning is under investigation.

comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by luigi@…

  • Status changed from resolved to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.