Opened 14 years ago
Last modified 12 years ago
#15 new editorial
chairs to review normative and informative references
Reported by: | hartmans-ietf@… | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Component: | draft-ietf-lisp |
Severity: | - | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
Some of the normative and informative references appear to be in the wrong category. The chairs should review this or delegate a review.
Change History (4)
comment:1 follow-up: ↓ 2 Changed 13 years ago by luigi@…
comment:2 in reply to: ↑ 1 Changed 13 years ago by luigi@…
Replying to luigi@…:
This is Comment 45
From Y. Rekhter's review:
14.1. Normative References:
Why is HIP a normative reference?
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by terry.manderson@…
Note to secretaries: Please review draft-ietf-lisp reference section for proper use of normative/informative references before submission to IESG occurs.
comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by terry.manderson@…
- Priority changed from major to minor
Secretaries reviewed the references, this is their report.
15.1. Normative References
[RFC0768] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768,
August 1980.
OK
[RFC1034] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities",
STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987.
Not needed for implementation or understanding. Move it to Informative.
[RFC1700] Reynolds, J. and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", RFC 1700,
October 1994.
IMHO this is not needed at all. The RFC just explains the process to assign number to protocols. Delete it or move it to the informative section.
[RFC1918] Rekhter, Y., Moskowitz, R., Karrenberg, D., Groot, G., and
- Lear, "Address Allocation for Private Internets", BCP 5, RFC 1918, February 1996.
OK
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
OK
[RFC2404] Madson, C. and R. Glenn, "The Use of HMAC-SHA-1-96 within
ESP and AH", RFC 2404, November 1998.
OK
[RFC2784] Farinacci, D., Li, T., Hanks, S., Meyer, D., and P.
Traina, "Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)", RFC 2784,
March 2000.
This is not needed for implementation and is cited just when authors state that router supporting GRE may be already able to do header prepending. Move it to informative.
[RFC3056] Carpenter, B. and K. Moore, "Connection of IPv6 Domains
via IPv4 Clouds", RFC 3056, February 2001.
This is not needed for implementation and is cited just when authors state that router supporting 6to4 may be already able to do header prepending. Move it to informative.
[RFC3168] Ramakrishnan, K., Floyd, S., and D. Black, "The Addition
of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP",
RFC 3168, September 2001.
OK
[RFC3261] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston,
A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E.
Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261,
June 2002.
Similar to the DNS RFC, is not needed for implementation or understanding. Move it to informative.
[RFC3775] Johnson, D., Perkins, C., and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support
in IPv6", RFC 3775, June 2004.
OK
[RFC4086] Eastlake, D., Schiller, J., and S. Crocker, "Randomness
Requirements for Security", BCP 106, RFC 4086, June 2005.
OK
[RFC4632] Fuller, V. and T. Li, "Classless Inter-domain Routing
(CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation
Plan", BCP 122, RFC 4632, August 2006.
OK
[RFC4634] Eastlake, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms
(SHA and HMAC-SHA)", RFC 4634, July 2006.
OK
[RFC4866] Arkko, J., Vogt, C., and W. Haddad, "Enhanced Route
Optimization for Mobile IPv6", RFC 4866, May 2007.
Not needed for implementation or understanding. Move it to informative.
[RFC4984] Meyer, D., Zhang, L., and K. Fall, "Report from the IAB
Workshop on Routing and Addressing", RFC 4984,
September 2007.
OK
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
May 2008.
OK
[RFC5496] Wijnands, IJ., Boers, A., and E. Rosen, "The Reverse Path
Forwarding (RPF) Vector TLV", RFC 5496, March 2009.
OK
[UDP-TUNNELS]
Eubanks, M. and P. Chimento, "UDP Checksums for Tunneled
Packets"", draft-eubanks-chimento-6man-00.txt (work in
progress), February 2009.
This is a tricky point. In principle we need what is proposed in the document, but this could block the publication as RFC.
We should check what is the state of the draft and if it will go further. Must in any case be updated to -01 which expires 27th April.
15.2. Informative References
[AFI] IANA, "Address Family Indicators (AFIs)", ADDRESS FAMILY
NUMBERS http://www.iana.org/.../address-family-numbers,
Febuary 2007.
This should be normative. it defines numbers and is needed for implementation.
[ALT] Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., and D. Lewis, "LISP
Alternative Topology (LISP-ALT)",
draft-ietf-lisp-alt-06.txt (work in progress), March 2011.
This should be normative since is needed to understand the architecture.
[CHIAPPA] Chiappa, J., "Endpoints and Endpoint names: A Proposed
Enhancement to the Internet Architecture", Internet-
Draft http://www.chiappa.net/~jnc/tech/endpoints.txt,
1999.
OK
[CONS] Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., and D. Meyer, "LISP-CONS: A
Content distribution Overlay Network Service for LISP",
draft-meyer-lisp-cons-03.txt (work in progress),
November 2007.
OK
[EMACS] Brim, S., Farinacci, D., Meyer, D., and J. Curran, "EID
Mappings Multicast Across Cooperating Systems for LISP",
draft-curran-lisp-emacs-00.txt (work in progress),
November 2007.
OK
[INTERWORK]
Lewis, D., Meyer, D., Farinacci, D., and V. Fuller,
"Interworking LISP with IPv4 and IPv6",
draft-ietf-lisp-interworking-02.txt (work in progress),
March 2011.
This should be normative since it is necessary to understand how the architecture works.
[LCAF] Farinacci, D., Meyer, D., and J. Snijders, "LISP Canonical
Address Format", draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-04.txt (work in
progress), October 2010.
This is present in the IANA section, hence should be normative for the code introduced in it. But is not a WG doc so it should possibly go to Informative.
[LISA96] Lear, E., Katinsky, J., Coffin, J., and D. Tharp,
"Renumbering: Threat or Menace?", Usenix , September 1996.
OK
[LISP-DEPLOY]
Jakab, L., Coras, F., Domingo-Pascual, J., and D. Lewis,
"LISP Network Element Deployment Considerations",
draft-jakab-lisp-deployment-02.txt (work in progress),
February 2011.
I would put this normative since has important information to understand the deployment and the architecture.
[LISP-LIG]
Farinacci, D. and D. Meyer, "LISP Internet Groper (LIG)",
draft-ietf-lisp-lig-01.txt (work in progress),
October 2010.
Normative since is part of the architecture.
[LISP-MAIN]
Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., and D. Lewis,
"Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)",
draft-farinacci-lisp-12.txt (work in progress),
March 2009.
OK
[LISP-MIB]
Schudel, G., Jain, A., and V. Moreno, "LISP MIB",
draft-ietf-lisp-mib-01.txt (work in progress), March 2011.
OK
[LISP-MN] Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Lewis, D., and D. Meyer, "LISP
Mobility Architecture", draft-meyer-lisp-mn-04.txt (work
in progress), October 2010.
OK
[LISP-MS] Farinacci, D. and V. Fuller, "LISP Map Server",
draft-ietf-lisp-ms-07.txt (work in progress), March 2011.
Normative, since is an important part of the architecture.
[LISP-SEC]
Maino, F., Ermagon, V., Cabellos, A., Sausez, D., and O.
Bonaventure, "LISP-Security (LISP-SEC)",
draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt (work in progress),
February 2011.
OK
[LOC-ID-ARCH]
Meyer, D. and D. Lewis, "Architectural Implications of
Locator/ID Separation",
draft-meyer-loc-id-implications-01.txt (work in progress),
Januaryr 2009.
OK
[MLISP] Farinacci, D., Meyer, D., Zwiebel, J., and S. Venaas,
"LISP for Multicast Environments",
draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-04.txt (work in progress),
October 2010.
Normative since it is part of the architecture.
[NERD] Lear, E., "NERD: A Not-so-novel EID to RLOC Database",
draft-lear-lisp-nerd-08.txt (work in progress),
March 2010.
OK
[OPENLISP]
Iannone, L. and O. Bonaventure, "OpenLISP Implementation
Report", draft-iannone-openlisp-implementation-01.txt
(work in progress), July 2008.
OK
[RADIR] Narten, T., "Routing and Addressing Problem Statement",
draft-narten-radir-problem-statement-00.txt (work in
progress), July 2007.
OK
[RFC3344bis]
Perkins, C., "IP Mobility Support for IPv4, revised",
draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3344bis-05 (work in progress),
July 2007.
OK
[RFC4192] Baker, F., Lear, E., and R. Droms, "Procedures for
Renumbering an IPv6 Network without a Flag Day", RFC 4192,
September 2005.
OK
[RPMD] Handley, M., Huici, F., and A. Greenhalgh, "RPMD: Protocol
for Routing Protocol Meta-data Dissemination",
draft-handley-p2ppush-unpublished-2007726.txt (work in
progress), July 2007.
OK
[VERSIONING]
Iannone, L., Saucez, D., and O. Bonaventure, "LISP Mapping
Versioning", draft-ietf-lisp-map-versioning-01.txt (work
in progress), March 2011.
Normative since it is part of the architecture.
From Y. Rekhter's review:
14.1. Normative References:
Why is HIP a normative reference?