Opened 7 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#1 new enhancement
When is customer-nat-address used?
Reported by: | adrian@… | Owned by: | draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | milestone1 |
Component: | l3vpn-service-model | Version: | 2.0 |
Severity: | Active WG Document | Keywords: | NAT |
Cc: |
Description
Issue raised by Aijun Wang (wangaijun@…)
What is the scenario where the leaf "customer-nat-address" will be used?
If the customer being provided one public address, why use NAT? if use NAT, why allocate such "customer-nat-address"?
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by wangaj@…
comment:2 in reply to: ↑ description Changed 7 years ago by bill.wu@…
Replying to adrian@…:
Issue raised by Aijun Wang (wangaijun@…)
What is the scenario where the leaf "customer-nat-address" will be used?
If the customer being provided one public address, why use NAT? if use NAT, why allocate such "customer-nat-address"?
There was agreement on the list to close this issue. No change is needed.
comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by bill.wu@…
- Component changed from draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model to l3vpn-service-model
- Milestone set to milestone1
- Owner changed from draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model@… to draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model@…
- Severity changed from - to Active WG Document
- Version set to 2.0
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
S.Litkowski has given the explanation during IETF Yokohama meeting. This issue can be closed.