Opened 6 years ago

Last modified 6 years ago

#95 new defect

Use of proper JSON terminology

Reported by: ietf@… Owned by: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature@…
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: json-web-signature Version:
Severity: - Keywords:
Cc:

Description

The current set of terminology uses terms that are lined to the JavaScript? specification rather than the IETF JSON specification. This needs to be discussed and a decision made.

Change History (1)

comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by michael.jones@…

The current intent is to consistently use the terminology in RFC 4627. If you can point out specific deviations from that terminology, that would be useful. Thanks.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.