![(please configure the [header_logo] section in trac.ini)](https://www.ietf.org/images/ietflogotrans.gif)
Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
#95 new defect
Use of proper JSON terminology
| Reported by: | ietf@… | Owned by: | draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | |
| Component: | json-web-signature | Version: | |
| Severity: | - | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
The current set of terminology uses terms that are lined to the JavaScript? specification rather than the IETF JSON specification. This needs to be discussed and a decision made.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
The current intent is to consistently use the terminology in RFC 4627. If you can point out specific deviations from that terminology, that would be useful. Thanks.