Changes between Version 27 and Version 28 of IcnSurveyDocument


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 29, 2013, 2:37:48 AM (6 years ago)
Author:
paulo.mendes@…
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • IcnSurveyDocument

    v27 v28  
    99
    1010== Document Abstract and outline ==
    11 Paulo (Mar 8th, 2013): Based on the discussion that we have been having before and after the Kista meeting. Here is the updated status about the Survey draft)
     11Paulo (Jul 29th, 2013): Based on the discussion that started at the time of the Kista meeting. Here is the updated status about the Survey draft, following the action points identified in the last meeting.
    1212[[BR]]
    1313
     
    1919
    2020'''Abstract''':
    21 This document provides a survey about possible directions for the evolution of ICN solutions. The goal of the document is not to provide a characterization of current ICN proposals, for which there is already significant literature. First of all, the document aims to reach a general consensus about the nature of the ICN paradigm (what are ICNs, what should ICNs be and who are the stakeholders). Second we analyze major architectural approaches for the instantiation of the ICN paradigm,ending up with the identification of several design choices. Special attention is given to the applicability areas described in the ICNRG Baseline Scenarios draft. The analyzed design choices may be specified by some of the technologic and scientific challenges to be described in the ICNRG Research Challenges draft.
     21This document provides a survey about possible directions for the evolution of Information-centric Networking (ICN) solutions. The goal of the document is not to provide a characterization of current ICN proposals, for which there is already significant literature. First of all, the document aims to reach a general consensus about the nature of the ICN paradigm (what are ICNs, what should ICNs be and who are the stakeholders). Second we analyze major architectural approaches for the instantiation of the ICN paradigm,ending up with the identification of several design choices. Special attention is given to the applicability areas described in the ICNRG Baseline Scenarios draft. The analyzed design choices may be specified by some of the technologic and scientific challenges to be described in the ICNRG Research Challenges draft.
    2222
    2323'''Outline''':
    24    1. Introduction[[BR]]
     24  1. Introduction[[BR]]
    2525      1.1. Scope[[BR]]
    2626      1.2. Related effort[[BR]]
    2727      1.3. Notation[[BR]]
    28    2. Information-centric Networking Paradigm[[BR]]
    29      2.1. What are ICNs?[[BR]]
    30      2.2. What should ICNs be?[[BR]]
    31      2.3. Who should the stakeholders be?[[BR]]
    32    3. Information-centric networking approaches[[BR]]
    33      3.1. Focus on the what: Declarative networking approach[[BR]]
    34      3.2. Focus on the how: Internetworking approach[[BR]]
    35    4. ICN architectural design choices[[BR]]
    36    5. Conclusion[[BR]]
     28  2. General View on Current ICN Paradigm[[BR]]
     29     2.1. Motivation[[BR]]
     30     2.2. ICN major characteristics[[BR]]
     31  3. ICN paradigm revisited[[BR]]
     32     3.1. Stakeholders[[BR]]
     33     3.2. Context awareness[[BR]]
     34     3.3. System support[[BR]]
     35     3.4. Programming support[[BR]]
     36  4. ICN architectural design choices[[BR]]
     37     4.1 Focus on the what: Declarative networking approach[[BR]]
     38     4.2 Focus on the How: Internetworking approach[[BR]]
     39  5. Conclusion[[BR]]
    3740
    3841'''NOTE''''''':
     
    4043   The current version of the draft is "draft-mendes-icnrg-survey-00.txt". This corresponds to vernon -00 to be analyzed in the Berlin and Hong Kong meetings. [[BR]]
    4144
    42 === Proposed sections - not yet included in the document outline ===
     45
     46=== Discussion on outline and overall contents of document ===
     47
     48   * Please remove this comment when you've written the first real comment. / Börje
     49   * ...
     50
     51== Links and references to material that can be included in the next version to this document ==
     52
     53   * [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6231276&contentType=Journals+%26+Magazines&sortType%3Dasc_p_Sequence%26filter%3DAND%28p_IS_Number%3A6231266%29 IEEE Communications Magazine "A survey of information-centric networking"]
     54
     55
     56
     57=== OLD Discussion ===
    4358
    4459   * survey of ICN routing and name schemes /Paulo Mendes
     
    5065      * Other architectures/related approaches, e.g. CURLING, Haggle
    5166   * Discussion of mobility support? /Gareth Tyson
    52 
    53 === Discussion on outline and overall contents of document ===
    54 
    55    * Please remove this comment when you've written the first real comment. / Börje
    56    * ...
    57 
    58 == Links and references to material relevant to this document ==
    59 
    60    * [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6231276&contentType=Journals+%26+Magazines&sortType%3Dasc_p_Sequence%26filter%3DAND%28p_IS_Number%3A6231266%29 IEEE Communications Magazine "A survey of information-centric networking"]
    6167
    6268== People interested in contributing to the draft ==