Opened 8 years ago

Closed 8 years ago

#74 closed defect (wontfix)

Resolving ambiguous registrations

Reported by: evnikita2@… Owned by:
Priority: minor Milestone:
Component: 4395bis Version:
Severity: - Keywords:
Cc:

Description

From http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2011Aug/0002.html:


Section 4:

(In the
unfortunate case that there are multiple, different uses of the
same scheme name, the IESG may approve a request to modify an
existing entry to note the separate use.)

I don't really think this may be necessary (probably for the sake of
robustness, but...). Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't know whether there
are some schemes which have different usage.

Change History (2)

comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by stpeter@…

The existing text seems fine to me, and I see no reason to remove it per this ticket.

comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by chris@…

  • Resolution set to wontfix
  • Status changed from new to closed

During the design team meeting today, Ted stated that "mms" was an example of a scheme name that had duplicate registrations and conflicing usages. In such a situation this text seems appropriate to leave as stated. Closing as won't fix.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.