wiki:IOTDirWiki

Internet-of-Things Directorate

Charter

The Internet of Things (IoT) refers to devices, that are often constrained in communication and computation capabilities, now becoming more commonly connected to the Internet, and various services that are built on top of the capabilities these devices jointly provide. It is expected that this development will usher in more machine-to-machine communication using the Internet with no human user actively involved.

Several working groups, spanning multiple areas within the IETF are developing protocols that are directly relevant to the IoT. In many cases, there is little or no organized coordination between these working groups.

In addition to internal IETF coordination, there is increasing need for communicating with other IoT standard organizations and alliances that are developing solutions. IoT is a very rapidly growing area of technology and connects with number of other emerging technologies. Many organizations outside IETF are not well aware of IoT work at IETF.

The IoT Directorate is an advisory group of experts selected by the Internet Area directors and the Directorate Chairs. The main purpose of the Directorate is coordination within IETF IoT groups and increasing IETF IoT standards visibility to external SDOs, alliances, and other organizations.

The primary tasks performed by the IoT Directorates are:

  • Reviewing IoT-relevant documents and other issues when requested by the Internet Area Directors, IETF WG chairs or other area directors for opinions/input on document relevance, or conflicts with other WG work. The Directorate may also point to a subject matter expert or a relevant working group as the home of new work items. For example:
    • Does the issue follow and conform to (or is in the spirit of) existing conventions, whether documented or not?
    • Does the issue warrant "going through" a particular non-IoT Working Group process or is the issue significant enough to justify joint review with a relevant IoT WG?
  • Acting as a resource for answering IoT-related questions that working groups encounter in their work on non-IoT protocols. For example:
    • If 6man WG is making changes to Neighbor Discovery, questions may arise as to whether these changes have special impact on 6tisch or 6lowpan networks. The IoT Directorate would, if asked, act as a resource for getting answers to those questions.
  • Cross-working group coordination efforts, such as
    • Should a document be reviewed jointly by multiple IoT groups where the work overlaps multiple groups' charters?
    • When a new idea is proposed for work at the IETF, helping to decide whether a research group or a working group should work on the idea, or whether it should not be worked on in the IETF.
    • When an idea being worked on in a research group matures, helping to determine whether it should now be worked on in an IETF working group.
    • Discuss upcoming plug-test events, workshops etc. activities ahead of time in IoT Directorate for conflict avoidance and scheduling
  • Being a focal point for external organizations
    • The IAB Liaison Manager and Internet Area ADs should be the first point of contact for external parties to about IETF work. The responsible AD may delegate the responsibilities to IoT Directorate Chairs for further communications
    • The Directorate shall produce basic information about IoT at IETF for external communication
    • The Directorate members are encouraged to speak at relevant IoT external events about IETF work
    • The Directorate communicates with other SDO members to bring them into IETF for presentations and informal communications
    • The IoT Directorate facilitates maintaining an IoT@IETF informational webpage for external communication

When to contact IoT Directorate chairs:

  • When unsure whether or not some proposed work belongs in an existing IoT working group, research group, or might motivate the creation of a new IoT group
  • When multi-IoT group review is needed
  • When non-IETF community requires information about IoT at IETF
  • When someone is working on a presentation about IoT work within the IETF and wants some cross-area review of the presentation

Chairs' Role in Cross-area coordination and outreach:

  • IoT Directorate chairs may contact relevant Area Directors or WG chairs when a new work or a document needs their attention
  • The chairs may be contacted by IoT Directorate members, Internet Area Directors, or other IETF members to arrange informational meetings with other IoT related SDOs. The chairs will facilitate such meetings by coordinating through IoT Directorate members and relevant WGs at the IETF.
  • The chairs may also involve the IETF IAB Liaison Manager for outreach of an external SDO.

IoT Directorate will do two different types of reviews:

  • Look at a document and see if it appears to have any special considerations relating to IoT technology and operations
  • Do a thorough review of a document and provide feedback on the document to whoever requested the review, and to the Area Directors

How the IoT Directorate document review is organized:

  • To the extent possible, document reviews will be spread across the entire membership of the IoT Directorate
  • Exceptions to this policy will be made when a particular IoT Directorate member has special knowledge of the particular topic of the requested review, but the chairs will ensure that the workload on any individual participant is similar to that of other participants
  • Whenever a document comes in for review, the chairs will attempt to identify a reviewer using two parallel methods:
    • A request for a volunteer to review the document will go out, with a time limit of three business days
    • A member will be chosen on a round-robin basis, and will be sent a notification that they have been assigned; they should not begin reviewing the document immediately, but should simply indicate whether or not they are able to review this particular document

Reasons to decline review include:

  • Not this reviewer's particular IoT area of expertise
  • Reviewer is not available
  • After three business days, if a volunteer has been identified that volunteer is directed to begin the review
  • The IoT Directorate chairs may re-assign the document to another volunteer member if the reviews are not performed by the committed date without any valid reason
  • In many cases it may be necessary to ask for help from non-IoT experts; in this case the Directorate chairs will liaise with chairs of other Directorates and Working Groups whose charter covers that area of knowledge.

IoT Directorate membership and participation criteria:

  • The pool of potential volunteers includes anyone who is recognized as having significant expertise in IoT work within the IETF and who is willing to do document reviews
  • Members may be appointed by IoT Directorate chairs or by INT Area Directors, and may be suggested by chairs of any working group
  • Membership is renewable for a two-year term
  • Active members are expected to review documents when requested, within reason
  • In some cases members may be included who do not have time to fulfil the role of active members in the sense of reviewing documents, but who are still considered valuable resources for the Directorate. Ordinarily, however, members are expected to participate in the document review process, and a failure to do so will result in the membership being revoked.
  • Membership in the IoT Directorate is provisional for new members. Prospective members are asked to write a letter explaining why it makes sense for them to be on the Directorate. Inclusion in the directorate will be subject to AD and/or chair approval.

IOT-DIR Responsible Area Directors & Co-chairs

Name Role
Terry Manderson Responsible IOT-DIR & Internet Area Director
Suresh Krishnan Internet Area Director
Ted Lemon IOT-DIR co-chair
Ari Keranen IOT-DIR co-chair
Samita Chakrabarti IOT-DIR co-chair

Directorate chairs e-mail contact: iot-dir-owner (at) ietf.org

More Information on IOT Directorate and reviews:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/iotdir/about/

Areas of Expertise

Members have different areas of expertise. These are listed here: [IotAreasOfExpertise]

Confirmed Members

Name IoT Expertise Employment Type Notes
Emmanuel Baccelli protocol design, IoT routing, hands-on implementation (RIOT, Linux) Academic (Applied Research) Focusing on enabling low-end IoT devices as part of Internet
Henk Birkholz Terminology, Architecture, Security Automation Industrial R&D, Academic TCG liaison
Creating the foundation for feasible application of machine learning and algorithmic intelligence in the domain of security automation
Carsten Bormann Protocol Design, Scalability and Architecture vs. Garrulity and Fluff, Usable Security; CoRE co-chair, T2TRG co-chair Academic, Technology Focusing on enabling constrained devices [RFC7228] as part of IoT
Nancy Cam-Winget 802.11, 802.15, 802.1X, ISA, ODVA, IICIndustrial R&D Interested in IoT transport and security
Samita Chakrabarti IP & Broadband,6lowpan, Cloud, 6lo co-chair Industrial, Telecom R&D Like to see IP(v6)/6lo connected IoT/M2M
Benoit Claise Operations & Management Industry
Robert Cragie ZigBee IP, Thread, LWIG co-chair
Subir Das JupiterMesh by ZigBee, 6lo, 802.1X, 802.11, 802.15, and 802.21 Industrial R&D Interested in IoT networks and security
Ralph Droms ZigBee IP, Xinu, NDN, 6lo Tech Advisor Industrial R&AD
Wesley Eddy space networks, avionics, smart fabric commercial and government R&D especially interested in transport topics
Mehmet Ersue Management of networks with constrained devices, RESTCONF Industrial
Stefanie Gerdes Usable Security Academic especially interested in Authorization
Bert Greevenbosch CoAP, Network Management, Security Industrial R&D
Brian Haberman Scaled-down network protocol stacks Academic (Applied Research)
Cullen Jennings COAP, APIs, Application platforms Industry Working on secure enrollment and platform APIs
Jaime Jimenez Device Management, IoT, CoRE co-chair Industrial, Telecom R&D
Michael Johas Teener Time-Sensitive Networking, PHYs, Switches, power-and-memory-limited devices Industrial, consumer applications system and network architecture, reducing cost and power while improving real-world performance
Richard Kelsey ZigBee, Thread Industry
Ari Keränen CoAP, Lifecycle Management; T2TRG co-chair Industrial, Telecom R&D
Suresh Krishnan INTAREA AD Telecom & Industrial R&D
Sandeep Kumar Secure Architecture, Protocol Design, Crypto for constrained devices Industrial Research Solving real-world IoT security issues
Ted Lemon IPv6 and IoT Industrial R&D
Jason Livingood Co-editor of BITAG IoT Security and Privacy paper, general operator interest Industry Focused on security and privacy for IoT, from impact on end users to impact on network operators and attack targets
Daniel Lux IOT Industry & telecom Focusing on constrained, particularly battery operated devices, security and devices communicating over extremely low bandwidth channels
Terry Manderson INTAREA AD Industrial & Telecom R&D
Gabriel Montenegro 6lo WG-chair Industrial R&D
Geoff Mulligan ZigBee, IP, CPS, 6lowpan, IPSO Industrial and Gov
Bruce Nordman Energy Efficiency Academic and Gov Architecture
Erik Nordmark IPv6/ND and IoT Industrial R&D
Charlie Perkins IOT, Mobility, IEEE Industry & Telecom R&D
Michael Richardson Linux, Contiki, ROLL, security Industry also think Authorization is key to success
Ines Robles ROLL co-chair Industrial Research Doing a PhD in IoT-Metrics oriented to application layer protocols
Dan Romascanu OPS and Management, IEEE protocols Industrial (retired)
Gonzalo Salgueiro IoT,CoAP,IPv6,CoRE, IPWAVE Industry Research & Academia Especially interested in IoT support & troubleshooting, Authoring book on IoT
Juergen Schoenwaelder TinyOS, Contiki, Linux, ... protocol coder Academic (Applied Research)
Eve Schooler Intel IOT, MMUSIC, AVT, ICN, Transport area expert Industry Research
Robert Sparks IAB Industry
Pascal Thubert 6TiSCH & LPWAN co-chair, RPL & ISA100.11a co-editor, 6LoWPAN 6loRH, HC & ND co-author Industrial R&AD Interested in problems connecting the IoT to the Internet e.g. e2e determinism for industrial and vehicular apps
Hannes Tschofenig Chairing a working group in a relevant area; working for ARM Industry I am particularly interested in security aspects.
Thomas Watteyne 6TiSCH co-chair, hands-on implementation Industrial (Low-Power Wireless)
Timothy Winters IPv6, IoT Industry and University
Last modified 3 weeks ago Last modified on Jun 5, 2017, 6:54:17 PM