Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of IETF95

07/04/16 19:54:30 (6 years ago)

Added DHC WG summary


  • IETF95

    v9 v10  
    3838* Future research in this area needs to be done to address the ability to replay queries.
     40== DHC ==
     42The DHC WG meet on Thursday from 1400-1600 (though we finished early, at 1530).
     44The following presentations were given with brief summary details (see the meeting minutes for more complete
     471. Manufacturer Usage Description Option (draft-lear-mud-framework and draft-lear-ietf-dhc-mud-option) was presented by Eliot Lear. There was some discussion to clarify the usage for these options (client to server, with server echoing to client) as these are not typically "other configuration" options. Also, there was a discussion as to where in the IETF this work should be done. AD (Suresh) to follow up.
     492. Secure DHCPv6 (draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6) and Secure DHCPv6 Deployment Considerations (draft-li-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-deployment) was presented by Ted Lemon for Lishan Li and co-authors. Some additional work is needed on the draft as perhaps too much (signature option) was removed? Also, there was a question as to whether the Deployment Considerations draft was needed (merge with other) or needs to be further expanded and perhaps moved to OPSEC?
     513. DHCPv6 Failover Update (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol) was presented by Bernie Volz for Kim Kinnear. Document should be ready for WGLC, but needs careful technical review. No volunteers stepped forward to review the document.
     534. DHCPv6 Prefix Length Hint Issues (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue) was presented by Bernie Volz for Tianxiang Li. The authors believe work is ready for WGLC. There was some discussion as to whether it should stay Informational or return to Standards Track.
     555. DHCP Relay / Server Communication and Pervasive Monitoring (no draft) was presented by Bernie Volz. This is the result on an IESG Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-access-network-identifier that relay to relay/server communication is not "secured" against pervasing monitoring. This needs to be taken to the list to determine whether the WG believe these is a problem here.
     576. DHCPv6bis update (draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis) was presented by Tomek Mrugalski for authors. The plan is to submit an 05 draft in May and initiate WGLC. Volunteers were found to review the document during WGLC.   
     597. Forcerenew Reconfiguration Extensions for DHCPv4 (draft-fang-dhc-dhcpv4-forcerenew-extensions) was presented by Luyuan Fang. While the document got a good reception, it isn't clear if there is sufficient interest to adopt this work; will be taken to then list.