Changes between Version 10 and Version 11 of IETF87

Timestamp:

09/08/13 12:10:25 (9 years ago)

Author:

brian@…

Comment:

--

IETF87

@@ -123 +123 @@
 
 Last, but not least, the chairs are proud to report that the vast majority of protocol discussion during the meeting was based not only on Internet Drafts, but on actual implementation (much of which has already been released as Open Source).
+
+== INTAREA ==
+The intarea working group met in Berlin for a two hour session. The
+draft containing the Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host
+Identifier (HOST_ID) in Shared Address Deployments describing has been
+published as RFC6967. The draft describing the use of the IPv6 Flow
+Label for Server Load Balancing has completed WGLC Will be progressed
+after this meeting. Brian Haberman presented some background
+information about the implementation status experiment described in
+RFC6982.
+
+There was a presentation describing a fragmentation strategy for
+GRE. There were some questions about how ECN information would be
+handled in the fragments. There were not enough participants who had
+read the draft and the chair requested volunteers to review the
+draft. There were two volunteers to do so. After receiving the reviews
+a call for adoption would be issued on the mailing list.
+
+There was a presentation concerning a set of drafts that describe how
+applications can use metadata to signal traffic characteristics to the
+network. There was lively discussion of this topic and the general
+sense of the room about these drafts was overall negative. It was also
+the opinion of several people who spoke up that tsvwg was the proper
+venue for this work.
+
+There was a presentation about a draft describing a stateless
+userplane for virtual evolved packet core networks. It was presented
+in intarea to increase awareness for this work being performed in the
+mobility related working groups in the intarea. There was widespread
+interest in this draft and further discussion will happen on the
+mailing list.
+
+There was a presentation concerning issues with IP links on
+spontaneous wireless networks. There was a lot of interest in this
+draft and since the issues raised in the draft are common across
+several types of wireless links intarea may be a good place to host
+this work. Further discussion and potential adoption will happen on
+the mailing list.
+
+The draft regarding scaling ARP for large data centers had been
+revised based on comments received at the IETF86 intarea meeting as
+well as on the mailing list. There were not enough people in the room
+who had read the draft and a call for adoption of this draft would be
+issued on the mailing list after the meeting.
+
+== SOFTWIRE ==
+The Softwire Working Group met at the IETF meeting in Berlin for a two
+and a half hour session. Since the Orlando meeting, Deployment
+Considerations for Dual-Stack Lite has been published as RFC6908 and
+the 6RD RADIUS draft has been published as RFC6930. The draft
+documenting Public 4over6 has been submitted to the IESG as an
+Informational document. The working group also adopted 3 new drafts as
+working group documents: lightweight 4over6, MAP MIB and MAP
+Radius. Two multicast related documents in the working group will be
+submitted to IESG soon: DS-Lite multicast and multicast-prefix-option,
+while the third, mesh multicast, will start a working group last call
+soon. WGLC has completed successfully on both the DS-Lite MIB and Mesh
+MIB drafts. These drafts will be sent for review by the MIB doctors
+before submitting to IESG. A call for adoption of the 6RD MIB draft
+has been issued on the mailing list, but a further review is needed
+on both document quality and necessity before adoption.
+
+The chairs received more than 20 requests for presentations. The wg
+documents including the unified CPE, lw4over6 and 4rd documents were
+prioritized and presented first. The goal was to get open issues on wg
+documents resolved first before discussing any new work. The meeting
+also allocated some time for discussion about the dhcp extensions for
+both MAP and lw4over6. WG discussed some related issues, especially on
+the tickets recorded by the Issue Tracker. There are still some open
+issues. Since the wg document of MAP DHCP has changed quite a bit, a
+consensus check will be performed on the mailing list regarding the
+scope of the draft. A draft describing use cases for MAP-T was
+presented and there was widespread support in the room to adopt
+it. The draft will be adopted as a wg item pending confirmation on the
+mailing list. There were some presentations related to lw4over6 and
+MAP-T and further discussion about this will take place on the mailing
+list.
+