Opened 10 years ago

Closed 10 years ago

#1 closed defect (fixed)

Error in ABNF + need to restructure ABNF

Reported by: alexey.melnikov@… Owned by: draft-ietf-imapmove-command@…
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: command Version: 2.0
Severity: In WG Last Call Keywords:
Cc:

Description

Reported by Dan Karp:

The ABNF should probably be phrased similarly to that of RFC 3501.
Thus, instead of

command-select =/ UID? "MOVE" SP set SP mailbox

it should probably read

command-select =/ move
move = "MOVE" SP sequence-set SP mailbox
uid = "UID" SP (copy / fetch / search / store / move)

(Note that even if you don't make this change, "set" needs to be
changed to "sequence-set". Also, use SP instead of including the
space in the "UID " literal.)

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by alexey.melnikov@…

I personally agree with these changes.

Mailing list message: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg04684.html

comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by ned.freed@…

ABNF updated to read:

capability =/ "MOVE"

command-select =/ move
move = "MOVE" SP sequence-set SP mailbox
uid = "UID" SP (copy / fetch / search / store / move)

comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by alexey.melnikov@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.