Changes between Version 8 and Version 9 of MediaTypes


Ignore:
Timestamp:
14/03/11 17:21:41 (12 years ago)
Author:
alexey.melnikov@…
Comment:

Added the link to IESG trac (for tracking) and restructured the text a bit

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • MediaTypes

    v8 v9  
    11= Media Type Registration Review Practices =
    22
    3 == Media Type Registration Reviews - Internet Drafts ==
    4 
     3== Media Type Registration Reviews - Standards !Tree, with or without Internet Drafts ==
    54
    65Section 5 of RFC 4288 and Section 2.2 of RFC 4289 describe media type
     
    2827(Note that the old archive was at <http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/>)
    2928
     29
     30== Additional process for Standards !Tree/No Internet Draft registrations ==
     31
     32IESG Experiment: The list of currently outstanding registrations from other SDOs with no Internet Draft can be found at:
     33 <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/report>
     34
    3035An IESG telechat management item is needed to review and approve standards
    3136tree registrations that are not documented in an I-D.  A management item is
     
    3439The request must contain text telling the Secretariat what you want done and
    3540the information that needs to be reviewed.  Here is an example:
    36 
    37 (cut and paste missed some material...need to repair...)
    3841
    3942  To: iesg-secretary@ietf.org[[BR]]
     
    5154  <your signature>
    5255
    53 == Media Type Registration Reviews - Standards !Tree/No Internet Draft ==
    5456
    5557The IESG has approved a request to register the "<media type>" MIME