Changes between Version 683 and Version 684 of InformalAgenda


Ignore:
Timestamp:
24/09/12 17:14:29 (11 years ago)
Author:
barryleiba@…
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • InformalAgenda

    v683 v684  
    1 = Informal Telechat 20-September-2012 =
     1= Informal Telechat 4-October-2012 =
    22
    33Web Ex URL: https://workgreen.webex.com/workgreen/j.php?ED=196609052&UID=0&PW=NN2MzN2ZlNDRj&RT=MiM0
    … …  
    1313== 3. Management Issues ==
    1414
    15 === 3.1 Expert Reviewers for RFC6711: An IANA Registry for Level of Assurance (LoA) Profiles (Sean) ===
     15=== 3.1 none yet (me) ===
    1616
    17 Having not done this before I thought I'd ask on the informal call before putting it on the formal call.  I'd like to set up an ietf mailing list for an expert pool for folks requesting assignments in:[[BR]]
    18 https://www.iana.org/assignments/loa-profiles/loa-profiles.xml
    19 
    20 The folks who have agreed to be on the list: Jim Fenton, Joni Brennan, John Bradley, Lucy Lynch, and Leif Johansson.
    21 
    22 Do I just put a management item on, get it agreed that the expert can be found at list-name@ietf.org, get a mailing list, and I'm done?
    23 
    24 === 3.2 Tying up loose ends, part 1: the Mini Note Well Summary (Barry) ===
    25 
    26 We seem to have gotten consensus on this:
    27 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DraftNoteWellSummary
    28 
    29 What's the next step toward using this by Atlanta?
    30 
    31 === 3.3 Tying up loose ends, part 2: The draft boilerplate change (Barry) ===
    32 
    33 We talked about having a specific boilerplate for cases where we are
    34 publishing something (such as documentation of a vendor-specific
    35 mechanism) where the community has consensus to publish, but consensus
    36 on the content doesn't make sense.  We seem to have consensus on this:
    37 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DraftBoilerplateChange
    38 
    39 What do we have to do next with this?
    40 
    41 === 3.4 Tying up loose ends, part 3: The document shepherd writeup revision (Barry) ===
    42 
    43 I've gotten and posted feedback on the current proposal for a new shepherd writeup format:
    44 http://tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DraftShepherdWriteupWgAlternate
    45 
    46 The feedback is at least somewhat favourable, and I've asked a couple of shepherds to try it out.  The first writeup has come in (to Pete), but we haven't acted on it yet.  It looks good, at least as I see it; it's what I had in mind, at least.
    47 
    48 Is it time to try it out with a few more shepherds?  Are other ADs willing to give it a shot?  Are we willing to change the ballot text correspondingly, at least for the trial cases?
    4917
    5018-------------------------------------------------------------------------------