Changes between Version 681 and Version 682 of InformalAgenda

Timestamp:

18/09/12 14:03:07 (11 years ago)

Author:

barryleiba@…

Comment:

--

InformalAgenda

@@ -21 +21 @@
 
 Do I just put a management item on, get it agreed that the expert can be found at list-name@ietf.org, get a mailing list, and I'm done?
+
+=== 3.2 Tying up loose ends, part 1: the Mini Note Well Summary (Barry) ===
+
+We seem to have gotten consensus on this:
+http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DraftNoteWellSummary
+
+What's the next step toward using this by Atlanta?
+
+=== 3.3 Tying up loose ends, part 2: The draft boilerplate change (Barry) ===
+
+We talked about having a specific boilerplate for cases where we are
+publishing something (such as documentation of a vendor-specific
+mechanism) where the community has consensus to publish, but consensus
+on the content doesn't make sense.  We seem to have consensus on this:
+http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DraftBoilerplateChange
+
+What do we have to do next with this?
+
+=== 3.4 Tying up loose ends, part 3: The document shepherd writeup revision (Barry) ===
+
+I've gotten and posted feedback on the current proposal for a new shepherd writeup format:
+http://tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DraftShepherdWriteupWgAlternate
+
+The feedback is at least somewhat favourable, and I've asked a couple of shepherds to try it out.  The first writeup has come in (to Pete), but we haven't acted on it yet.  It looks good, at least as I see it; it's what I had in mind, at least.
+
+Is it time to try it out with a few more shepherds?  Are other ADs willing to give it a shot?  Are we willing to change the ballot text correspondingly, at least for the trial cases?
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------