Changes between Version 371 and Version 372 of InformalAgenda


Ignore:
Timestamp:
10/01/11 19:06:04 (12 years ago)
Author:
adrian.farrel@…
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • InformalAgenda

    v371 v372  
    11
    2 = Informal Telechat 2010-12-23 =
     2= Informal Telechat 2011-01-13 =
    33
    44Web Ex URL: https://workgreen.webex.com/workgreen/j.php?ED=148122542&UID=0&PW=NOTk3MTBmMTY1&RT=MiMxMQ%3D%3D
    … …  
    1010== 2. Document Discussions ==
    1111
    12 === 2.1 draft-ietf-roll-rpl ===
     12=== 2.1 draft-ietf-roll-trickle ===
    1313
    14 Added by Adrian. !Ralph/Jari/Tim - We need to move forward on your Discusses.
    15 
    16 Ralph and Jari seem to have reached agreement with the editors.
    17 Tim: The editors are waiting on information from you.
    18 
    19 === 2.2 draft-ietf-pkix-certimage ===
    20 
    21 Added by Alexey: Tim, are you happy with the latest text I proposed to address my DISCUSS?
    22 
    23 === 2.3 draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd ===
    24 
    25 Added by Jari.
    26 
    27 Dan, Adrian, Alexey: does the new version address your discusses?
     14Added by Adrian. Lars - Anything else needed to resolve your Discuss?
    2815
    2916== 3. Management Issues ==
    30 
    31 === 3.1. Subordinate domains (Russ) ===
    32 
    33 What are the criteria for adding domains under ietf.org?  What are the criteria
    34 for removing domains that are already there?
    35 
    36 === 3.2. Lightening talks (Russ) ===
    37 
    38 How can we accomodate lightening talks in the IETF meeting schedule?
    39 
    40 === 3.3. XMPP WG interim meeting (Alexey) ===
    41 
    42 There is a proposal to have XMPP WG face-to-face interim in Brussels (around Feb 5-7), co-located with XSF/FOSDEM meeting. One of the main topics to discuss is internationalization and future migration to IDNA2008. What do RAI ADs (and the rest of IESG) think about that?
    43 
    44 === 3.4. TTP & IPTM IANA Action (Sean) ===
    45 
    46 Trying to close out the action.  The protocol does have a version # and they won't conflict.  Following changes proposed (okay?):
    47 
    48 OLD:
    49 
    50 Decimal 84
    51 
    52 Keyword TTP
    53 
    54 Protocol TTP
    55 
    56 Reference [Jim_Stevens] Stevens&isi.edu
    57 
    58 
    59 NEW:
    60 
    61 Decimal 84
    62 
    63 Keyword IPTM
    64 
    65 Protocol Internet Protocol Traffic Manager
    66 
    67 Reference [Jim_Stevens] jasteven@rockwellcollins.com
    68 
    6917
    7018------