Version 3 (modified by rdroms@…, 11 years ago) (diff)


  • Significant technical concern with the viability of the work
  • Significant procedural concern with the ability to complete the work effectively due to low energy levels, contentiousness, (Ralph) overly large scope of the work, etc.
  • Lack of technical clarity on what the work and deliverables will actually consist of
  • Lack of scope for what is clearly in-bounds versus things that should be explicitly forbidden
  • Overlap or interference with other work inside or outside the IETF, which would lead to clear harm or significant operational issues
  • Quality of writing and editing poor enough to prevent effective external review of the proposed work
  • It's a really really bad idea (e.g. key escrow)
  • Inappropriate phasing of the work that may lead to inadequate focus or end-runs of consensus process.
  • (Ralph) Out of scope for the IETF