Feedback on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-internetworking
Current draft pointer
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking/
Reviews for draft
- Susan Hares Review Hares-review-draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-internetworking-05 (7/27/2021)
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/xr35SuwoY6pJTYS0J2tSopiH-4E/
- Jorge response (9/22/2021)
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/in9NoyDZ2VUAvy4qE4m-6XkKCJY/
- Sue's response 3/21/2022
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/JaBpkLWzkb3JOQGkR57M38uAAkc/
Summary points
- 1) Lack of error handling for NLRIs which carry semantics beyond prefixes.
- 2) Domain BGP Path Attribute (section 4) debugging and scaling
- 3) Route selection process modifies the RFC4271 and may not scale
- 4) Error handling in Gateway PE (section 8) between different AFI/SAFI prefixes is unclear
- 5) Is section 7 normative or informative
- 6) Section 11 security considerations needs to align with document
Last modified 8 weeks ago
Last modified on 23/03/22 12:23:30
![(please configure the [header_logo] section in trac.ini)](https://www.ietf.org/images/ietflogotrans.gif)