Mykyta's Review

[evnikita2@…]

I'm for publication of this document and have 2 minor comments.

I see this draft is going to in fact replace what was previously defined in RFC 5620. Then I don't see why this document isn't going to obsolete that one. In this case, it will be indicated that Version 1 of RFC Editor model is no more to be used in favor of Version 2.

In Section 2.3:

[RFC Production Center]:

9. Coordinating with IANA to perform protocol parameter registry

actions;

In RFC 5620 we had corresponding relation in the Figure 1:

------ --v--------v----------v-----------v-----

| | | |
| IANA | <->| RFC Production Center <
| | | |

------ -----------------^{----------------------}

which I can't find in the current document. I personally think it won't be redundant to mention this here, for clarity.

Thanks,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev

[Bernard_Aboba@…]

More from Mykyta:

Excuses, one additional comment, Section 2.1.6:

[RSE should have:]

8. Willingness to Travel.

I wonder why it's "willingness". I think "ability" is better and represents the point clearer. Mykyta

[jmh@…]

Willingness was amended to say reflect both willingness and ability.
The IANA was not added to the figure after review of the context.