Opened 11 years ago

Closed 7 years ago

#75 closed editorial (incorporated)

RFC2145 Normative

Reported by: mnot@… Owned by: fielding@…
Priority: normal Milestone: 13
Component: p1-messaging Severity: Active WG Document
Keywords: Cc:

Description

Should RFC2145 references be normative?

Change History (6)

comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…

  • Component set to auth
  • Milestone set to unassigned

comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…

  • Component changed from auth to non-specific

comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by fielding@…

  • Owner set to fielding@…
  • Status changed from new to assigned
  • Type changed from design to editorial

It can't be normative -- 2145 is an Informational RFC. IIRC, the text was supposed to be included in the 2616 revision.

We should check that the text on versions is included (editorial).

comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by mnot@…

  • Component changed from non-specific to p1-messaging

comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by fielding@…

From [1148]:

Move section on transport independence up so that it can describe what connections are before they are used in other explanations.

Try to explain both the philosophy and practice of HTTP versioning so that future protocol designers will understand what the numbers mean and why they are necessary. Incorporated all of the relevant versioning requirements from RFC2145 and added that RFC to the obsoleted list.

Addresses #75

comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by fielding@…

  • Milestone changed from unassigned to 13
  • Priority set to normal
  • Resolution set to incorporated
  • Severity set to Active WG Document
  • Status changed from assigned to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.