Opened 15 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#56 closed editorial (fixed)
6.1.1 can be misread as a complete list
Reported by: | mnot@… | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Milestone: | 01 | |
Component: | p2-semantics | Severity: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
The second sentence in the first paragraph can on a quick reading be misread as section 10 contains a complete definiton of all possible status codes, where it in reality only has the status codes defined by this RFC.
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by mnot@…
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by mnot@…
- Component set to semantics
- Milestone set to unassigned
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by fielding@…
- Milestone changed from unassigned to 01
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Fixed in [149] by changing to "The status codes listed below are defined in ..."
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Change "These codes are fully defined in section 10."
Into
"The status codes defined by this RFC is fully defined in section 10."