Opened 8 years ago

Closed 8 years ago

#533 closed editorial (wontfix)

IESG ballot on draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25

Reported by: julian.reschke@… Owned by: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional@…
Priority: normal Milestone: 26
Component: p4-conditional Severity: In IESG Evaluation
Keywords: Cc:

Description (last modified by julian.reschke@…)

Jari Arkko

Comment (2013-12-19)

Meral Shirazipour raised some editorial comments in the Gen-ART review. I thought that the examples comment was a valid one, for instance. But I have not seen a response. Did the authors consider the comments?

(Of course, not all comments may result in changes. For instance, the issues of splitting or merging the documents are in my opinion something that is difficult to deal with at this stage, and I understand the WG if they do not want to make changes. Assuming all relevant text is still somewhere and reachable through references, of course.)

see #525


Sean Turner

Comment (2013-12-19)

*) I'll not repeats the OWS discuss point from p1. If it gets changed there I assume it will get changed here. If not then this can be ignored. -- see #537

0) Abstract: Maybe would add stateless in front of protocol in the description. -- see #538

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by julian.reschke@…

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by julian.reschke@…

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by julian.reschke@…

  • Description modified (diff)
  • Resolution set to wontfix
  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Type changed from design to editorial
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.