Opened 15 years ago

Closed 15 years ago

#51 closed editorial (fixed)

HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date

Reported by: mnot@… Owned by:
Priority: Milestone: unassigned
Component: p1-messaging Severity:
Keywords: Cc:


Should rfc1123-date BNF be used where the specification calls for something to be a HTTP-date, but only the RFC1123 form? Should separate rules for producing and consuming dates be specified?

Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by mnot@…

  • Component set to auth
  • Milestone set to unassigned

comment:2 Changed 15 years ago by mnot@…

  • Component changed from auth to messaging

comment:3 Changed 15 years ago by mnot@…

  • Type changed from design to editorial

comment:4 Changed 15 years ago by julian.reschke@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

Fixed in [239]:

Resolve #51: make it obvious from the BNF that most of the date formats that must be accepted are indeed obsolete (closes #51).

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.