Opened 9 years ago

Closed 9 years ago

#494 closed editorial (incorporated)

obsolete 2617?

Reported by: julian.reschke@… Owned by: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth@…
Priority: later Milestone: 25
Component: p7-auth Severity: In IETF LC
Keywords: Cc:

Description

We currently say "updates 2617", as we do not include the definitions of Basic and Digest, and thus 2617 is still needed.

The HTTPAuth WG however *is* working on replacements for these documents. After LC we should revisit what we can say about the relation to 2617.

Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by mnot@…

  • Priority changed from normal to later
  • Type changed from design to editorial

"Updates" is not "Obsoletes."

comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by julian.reschke@…

Understood, but people will ask why 2617 isn't obsoleted. If the reason is "it takes three documents", and the two others are being worked on, we may want to actually try that.

comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by fielding@…

Well, we can "try" that after we publish this round of RFCs.

comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by julian.reschke@…

  • Milestone changed from unassigned to 25
  • Resolution set to incorporated
  • Severity changed from In WG Last Call to In IETF LC
  • Status changed from new to closed

Set to WONTFIX for now, as the HTTPAUTH WG's documents are not ready yet.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.