Opened 10 years ago

Closed 10 years ago

#390 closed editorial (incorporated)

use of ABNF terms from RFC 3986

Reported by: julian.reschke@… Owned by: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging@…
Priority: normal Milestone: 22
Component: p1-messaging Severity: In WG Last Call
Keywords: Cc:


2.7.1. http URI scheme

If the host identifier is provided as an IP literal or IPv4 address,

We don't import the "IP-literal" and "IPv4address" rules from 3986, so this would make more sense as just "provided as an IP address".

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by fielding@…

That would just result in IESG comments about it not mentioning IPv6 as distinct.

comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by fielding@…

From [2029]:

(editorial) just refer to IP address since we don't distinguish IPv4 vs IPv6 anywhere else; addresses #390

comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by fielding@…

  • Resolution set to incorporated
  • Status changed from new to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.