Opened 7 years ago

Closed 6 years ago

#384 closed editorial (incorporated)

unclear prose in definition of 304

Reported by: julian.reschke@… Owned by: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional@…
Priority: normal Milestone: 22
Component: p4-conditional Severity: In WG Last Call
Keywords: Cc:

Description

<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-latest.html#status.304>:

"... In other words, there is no need for the server to transfer a representation of the target resource because the client's request indicates that it already has a valid representation, as indicated by the 304 response header fields, and is therefore redirecting the client to make use of that stored representation as if it were the payload of a 200 response. ..."

should this be "304 status code" instead of "304 response header fields"?

Change History (2)

comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by fielding@…

From [2042]:

clarify description of 304 status code; addresses #384

comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by fielding@…

  • Milestone changed from unassigned to 22
  • Resolution set to incorporated
  • Status changed from new to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.