Opened 11 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#377 closed design (fixed)
what is the idempotency of LINK and UNLINK?
Reported by: | julian.reschke@… | Owned by: | draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 21 |
Component: | method-registrations | Severity: | Active WG Document |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
These are underspecified in RFC 2068. What should the registry say about them?
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Summary changed from what is the idempotency of LINK and UNLINK to what is the idempotency of LINK and UNLINK?
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by fielding@…
They are both idempotent.
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Resolution set to incorporated
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by mnot@…
- Milestone changed from unassigned to 21
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by mnot@…
- Resolution incorporated deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by mnot@…
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from reopened to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
My .02 - "unknown" or "unspecified"