Opened 11 years ago

Closed 10 years ago

#377 closed design (fixed)

what is the idempotency of LINK and UNLINK?

Reported by: julian.reschke@… Owned by: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations@…
Priority: normal Milestone: 21
Component: method-registrations Severity: Active WG Document
Keywords: Cc:

Description

These are underspecified in RFC 2068. What should the registry say about them?

Change History (8)

comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…

  • Summary changed from what is the idempotency of LINK and UNLINK to what is the idempotency of LINK and UNLINK?

comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…

My .02 - "unknown" or "unspecified"

comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by fielding@…

They are both idempotent.

comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…

From [1870]:

note idempotency of LINK and UNLINK (see #377)

comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…

  • Resolution set to incorporated
  • Status changed from new to closed

comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by mnot@…

  • Milestone changed from unassigned to 21

comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by mnot@…

  • Resolution incorporated deleted
  • Status changed from closed to reopened

comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by mnot@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from reopened to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.