Opened 11 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#364 closed design (fixed)
Capturing more information in the method registry
Reported by: | mnot@… | Owned by: | julian.reschke@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 21 |
Component: | p2-semantics | Severity: | Active WG Document |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
We established the method registry in #72, and considered recording idempotency there. However, we closed that issue without a definitive answer, because we were still discussing the definition of idempotency.
Should we add idempotency to the method registry? Anything else?
Change History (15)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by algermissen@…
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
Proposal is to add idempotency (not others).
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Milestone changed from unassigned to 20
comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Owner changed from draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics@… to julian.reschke@…
comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:7 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Resolution set to incorporated
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:8 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Milestone changed from 20 to unassigned
I just realized that, in the initial method registrations document, we haven't decided on idempotency for some methods. Either we need to fix that, or leave a loophole in the registration process for not specifying it under circumstances like these.
comment:9 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Resolution incorporated deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
comment:10 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
Does #377 capture everything -- i.e., can this be closed?
comment:11 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
If we resolve #377 by finding out what the idempotency of these is: yes. If not, we need to tune the registration procedure for entries like undefined/unspecified.
comment:12 Changed 10 years ago by fielding@…
Why don't we also list cacheable?
comment:13 Changed 10 years ago by fielding@…
- Milestone changed from unassigned to 21
- Resolution set to incorporated
- Status changed from reopened to closed
Never mind, the table is good enough as is.
comment:14 Changed 10 years ago by mnot@…
- Resolution incorporated deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
comment:15 Changed 10 years ago by mnot@…
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from reopened to closed
Roy came up with this table a while ago:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rest-discuss/message/4732?var=0&l=1