Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #332


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jan 24, 2012, 9:54:26 AM (8 years ago)
Author:
julian.reschke@…
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #332 – Description

    initial v1  
    99  a user to repeat the original request on the new URI.
    1010
    11 strikes me as a bad idea. It's a transient problem so it should be con-
    12 ditioned and how widely supported this is, and it's only useful if you
     11strikes me as a bad idea. It's a transient problem so it should be conditioned and how widely supported this is, and it's only useful if you
    1312have some HTML implementation on the other end or an interactive user; a
    1413web service not meant for interactive use where you can be sure that the
    1514code is supported, because, say, you control the client, is unaffected,
    1615and if you add that as another exception you basically end up saying you
    17 can do this so your site works better with legacy clients in some situ-
    18 ations and making your site work good is probably a good idea, so I'd
     16can do this so your site works better with legacy clients in some situations and making your site work good is probably a good idea, so I'd
    1917prefer just saying that. I don't really want to ponder whether I should
    2018send this hypertext response in response to an OPTIONS request in 2015,