Opened 11 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#331 closed editorial (incorporated)
clarify that 201 doesn't require Location header fields
Reported by: | julian.reschke@… | Owned by: | julian.reschke@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 19 |
Component: | p2-semantics | Severity: | Active WG Document |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
"The newly created resource can be referenced by the URI(s) returned in the payload of the response, with the most specific URI for the resource given by a Location header field."
Some people read this as a requirement to include "Location". At least for PUT->201 that's nonsense, however.
Attachments (2)
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Owner changed from draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics@… to julian.reschke@…
- Status changed from new to assigned
Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Milestone changed from unassigned to 19
- Resolution set to incorporated
- Status changed from assigned to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Proposed patch