Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#323 closed editorial (incorporated)
intended maturity level vs normative references
Reported by: | julian.reschke@… | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 18 |
Component: | non-specific | Severity: | Active WG Document |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
The working assumption for a long time was that we recycle at Draft standard. That standards level is gone, and for going to Full Standard, we probably changed too much.
This leaves us with the option to go "back" to Proposed (*), in which case we can remove the prose in the Normative References about downrefs to other specs at Proposed level (namely, RFCs 1950..2).
(*) In which case we should plan to go to full standard as soon as possible afterwards.
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Type changed from design to editorial
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Milestone changed from unassigned to 18
- Resolution set to incorporated
- Status changed from new to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
At this point, it looks like we need to go Proposed; flipping to editorial.