Opened 9 years ago

Closed 9 years ago

#316 closed editorial (duplicate)

Consider referencing the 'origin' draft

Reported by: mnot@… Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone: unassigned
Component: non-specific Severity: Active WG Document
Keywords: Cc:

Description

In a few places, we make use of something that roughly aligns to origin (scheme/host/port). We should consider referencing the draft and using its terminology.

E.g., cache invalidation, OPTIONS* response scope.

Change History (2)

comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by julian.reschke@…

Note: Origin is "Proposed", our plan *was* to recycle at "Draft".

This may be irrelevant now that "Draft" is gone, and we won't get to full standard anyway. It might be a problem if we wish to go to full standard with httpbisbis quickly, though.

comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by mnot@…

  • Resolution set to duplicate
  • Status changed from new to closed

dup of #322

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.