Opened 9 years ago

Closed 8 years ago

#258 closed editorial (fixed)

Avoid passive voice in message requirements

Reported by: mnot@… Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone: unassigned
Component: content-disp Severity: In WG Last Call
Keywords: Cc:

Description

=> Parameter names MUST NOT be repeated.

The document should not phrase normative requirements in the passive voice. Instead, the document should make clear which protocol partipants are bound by each requirement. For example, this requirement probably should read "servers MUST NOT generate Content-Disposition header field values with multiple instances of the same parameter name."

Suggested:

Senders MUST NOT generate C-D header field values with multiple instances of the same parameter name.

... and look for similar constructs throughout the draft.

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by julian.reschke@…

  • Resolution set to incorporated
  • Status changed from new to closed

see [1073]

comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by mnot@…

  • Resolution incorporated deleted
  • Status changed from closed to reopened

comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by mnot@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from reopened to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.