Opened 10 years ago

Closed 9 years ago

#253 closed editorial (fixed)

clarify what LWS means for the Content-Disp grammar

Reported by: julian.reschke@… Owned by: julian.reschke@…
Priority: normal Milestone: unassigned
Component: content-disp Severity: Active WG Document
Keywords: Cc:

Description

We do say that we use RFC 2616's ABNF syntax, but we should make it clearer what that means for the content-disposition syntax.

Change History (6)

comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…

  • Summary changed from clarity what LWS means for the Content-Disp grammar to clarify what LWS means for the Content-Disp grammar

comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…

  • Owner set to julian.reschke@…

comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…

From [1060]:

Add more prose about implied LWS, also include quoted-string into the ABNF, and explain that value is "token | quoted-string" (see #253)

comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by julian.reschke@…

  • Resolution set to incorporated
  • Status changed from new to closed

comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by mnot@…

  • Resolution incorporated deleted
  • Status changed from closed to reopened

comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by mnot@…

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from reopened to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.