Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#249 closed design (fixed)
Does no-store in request imply no-cache?
Reported by: | mnot@… | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 13 |
Component: | p6-cache | Severity: | Active WG Document |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
One interpretation of RFC 2616 allows the proxy to serve hits when
the request contains "Cache-Control: no-store". Do you think such an interpretation is valid?
no-store
The purpose of the no-store directive is to prevent the inadvertent release or retention of sensitive information (for example, on backup tapes). The no-store directive applies to the entire message, and MAY be sent either in a response or in a request. If sent in a request, a cache MUST NOT store any part of either this request or any response to it.
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Milestone changed from unassigned to 13
- Resolution set to incorporated
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Resolution incorporated deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Resolution set to incorporated
- Status changed from reopened to closed
comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Resolution incorporated deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from reopened to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
See [1110]