#219 closed editorial (incorporated)
Revise Acknowledgements Sections
Reported by: | julian.reschke@… | Owned by: | julian.reschke@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 17 |
Component: | non-specific | Severity: | Active WG Document |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
At some point we need to revise the acknowledgements sections.
Related questions to answer (feedback appreciated):
1) Keep the 2068/2616 acks, or just refer to them.
2) New acks: just a generic statement wrt to the mailing list and working group, or for specific individuals (to be mined from the archives).
3) One section per Part, or just maintain them in Part 1?
Change History (53)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by julian.reschke@…
I have started work on a tool that will generate statistics from the mailing list archives (will add it to SVN at the point where it does something useful)
comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by julian.reschke@…
1) Remove 2068/2616 Acks, but refer to them.
2) All Acks in Part 1, with pointers to there from the other Parts.
3) Mint names from mailing list traffic (since RFC 2616), with a threshold, plus include names from a whitelist with specific acks to be included.
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Owner set to julian.reschke@…
comment:6 Changed 12 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:7 Changed 12 years ago by julian.reschke@…
Done with cleanup; adding new Acks still left to do.
comment:8 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:9 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Milestone changed from unassigned to 17
comment:10 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Resolution set to incorporated
- Status changed from new to closed
With [1411], most work is done. The list will be regenerated from time to time, though.
My feedback:
1) refer to them
2) try to ack individuals
3) one section in part 1