#141 closed design (fixed)
should we have an auth scheme registry
| Reported by: | julian.reschke@… | Owned by: | julian.reschke@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 12 |
| Component: | p7-auth | Severity: | Active WG Document |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
There's currently no IANA registry for authentication schemes.
Should we have one?
Change History (13)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by mnot@…
- Priority set to blocked
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by julian.reschke@…
Didn't we already take responsibility for parts of RFC 2617 by having Part 7?
comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Owner set to julian.reschke@…
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:6 Changed 12 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:7 Changed 12 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Milestone changed from unassigned to 13
comment:8 Changed 12 years ago by julian.reschke@…
This one can be closed once we have submitted draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-00
comment:9 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Milestone changed from 13 to 12
- Resolution set to incorporated
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:10 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Resolution incorporated deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
comment:11 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from reopened to closed
comment:12 Changed 11 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:13 Changed 10 years ago by mnot@…
- Severity changed from Candidate WG Document to Active WG Document
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
![(please configure the [header_logo] section in trac.ini)](https://www.ietf.org/images/ietflogotrans.gif)
Blocked until we take responsibility for 2617