#140 closed editorial (fixed)
update note citing RFC 1945 and 2068
Reported by: | julian.reschke@… | Owned by: | julian.reschke@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 08 |
Component: | p2-semantics | Severity: | Active WG Document |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Part2 notes about status 302:
"Note: [RFC1945] and [RFC2068] specify that the client is not allowed to change the method on the redirected request. However, most existing user agent implementations treat 302 as if it were a 303 response, performing a GET on the Location field-value regardless of the original request method. The status codes 303 and 307 have been added for servers that wish to make unambiguously clear which kind of reaction is expected of the client."
This needs to be rephrased in terms of RFC2616 instead of RFC2068 (I think).
Attachments (1)
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Milestone changed from unassigned to 08
- Owner set to julian.reschke@…
- Status changed from new to assigned
Changed 14 years ago by julian.reschke@…
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by julian.reschke@…
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from assigned to closed
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by mnot@…
- Priority set to normal
- Severity changed from Candidate WG Document to Active WG Document
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Proposed patch.